Discovery of a relation between black hole mass and soft X-ray time lags in active galactic nuclei

By B. Marco, G. Ponti, M. Cappi, Mauro Dadina, P. Uttley, E. Cackett, A. C. Fabian, G. Miniutti. 2011

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We carried out a systematic analysis of time lags between X-ray energy bands in a large sample (32 sources) of unabsorbed, radio quiet active galactic nuclei (AGN), observed by XMM-Newton. The analysis of X-ray lags (up to the highest/shortest frequencies/time-scales), is performed in the Fourier-frequency domain, between energy bands where the soft excess (soft band) and the primary power law (hard band) dominate the emission. We report a total of 15 out of 32 sources displaying a high-frequency soft lag in their light curves. All 15 are at a significance level exceeding 97 per cent and 11 are at a level exceeding 99 per cent. Of these soft lags, seven have not been previously reported in the literature, thus this work significantly increases the number of known sources with a soft/negative lag. The characteristic time-scales of the soft/negative lag are relatively short (with typical frequencies and amplitudes of ν ∼ 0.07-4 × 10−3 Hz and τ ∼ 10-600 s, respectively), and show a highly significant (≳4σ) correlation with the black hole mass. The measured correlations indicate that soft lags are systematically shifted to lower frequencies and higher absolute amplitudes as the mass of the source increases. To first approximation, all the sources in the sample are consistent with having similar mass-scaled lag properties. These results strongly suggest the existence of a mass-scaling law for the soft/negative lag, that holds for AGN spanning a large range of masses (about 2.5 orders of magnitude), thus supporting the idea that soft lags originate in the innermost regions of AGN and are powerful tools for testing their physics and geometry.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a2f40b8b7a9f55ae7d36db7bab799dffdade7f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. A. C. Fabian
  3. R. Hickox
  4. C. Reynolds
  5. D. Wilkins
  6. Mara Salvato
  7. E. Kara
  8. P. Uttley

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. A. C. Fabian
  3. R. Hickox
  4. C. Reynolds
  5. P. Padovani
  6. E. Cackett
  7. E. Kara
  8. P. Uttley

Citations in the corpus