DEFINING THE INTENSITY OF CONDITIONING REGIMENS : working definitions

By A. Bacigalupo, K. Ballen, D. Rizzo, S. Giralt, H. Lazarus, V. Ho, J. Apperley, S. Slavin, M. Pasquini, B. Sandmaier and 4 more. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2009

1,682 citations recorded by the source corpus.

SUMMARY Defining conditioning regimen intensity has become a critical issue for the hemopoietic stem cell transplant community. In the present report we propose to define conditioning regimens in three categories: (a) myeloablative conditioning (MA) , (b) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and (c) non myeloablative conditioning (NMA). Assignment to these categories is based on the duration of cytopenia and on the requirement for stem cell (SC) support: MA regimens cause irreversible cytopenia and SC support is mandatory. NMA regimens cause minimal cytopenia and can be given also without SC support. RIC regimens do not fit criteria for MA or NMA regimens : they cause cytopenia of variable duration and should be given with stem cell support, although cytopenia may not be irreversible. This report also assigns commonly used regimens to one of these categories. based upon the agents, dose or combinations. Standardized classification of conditioning regimen intensities will allow comparison across studies and interpretation of study results.

Subfields: Hematology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a2c5b5f526f2437d85e08e8d2bef2facba6af42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

  1. Eric G. Pamer

Citations in the corpus