Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents

By R. Berto. 2007

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How to Measure the Restorative Quality of Environments: The PRS-11 (2014, methodology): “Seventeen items were selected from the original 26-item version of Hartig et al.’s (1997a) and Pasini et al.’s (2009) instruments, and in some cases modified, using the cognitive interview technique (Willis, 2005) and recommendations from previous research.”
Development of the PRCQ: A measure of perceived restorative characteristics of zoo attractions (2009, background): “Because literature shows that familiarity and gender do not have a strong influence on perceived restorativeness and preference, we did not control for these variables (Berto, 2007; Purcell et al., 2001; Strumse, 1996).”
The Role of Nature in Coping with Psycho-Physiological Stress: A Literature Review on Restorativeness (2014, unknown): “with gender or age [100].”
The Role of Methodological Choices in the Effects of Experimental Exposure to Simulated Natural Landscapes on Human Health and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “…influences on study findings are sociodemographic factors (Browning & Lee, 2017; Markevych et al., 2017; Russell et al., 2013), urbanicity (Berto, 2007; Wilkie & Clouston, 2015), preferences and familiarity with landscapes (Han, 2007; Nanda et al., 2008; Thake et al., 2017; Valtchanov &…”