Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide

By Cathy Urquhart. 2012

973 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a0fd52ffbdc16e8fae412310c5012b5e00fd36d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research (2017, methodology): “The range criterion is likely to be the most easily satisfied of the criteria as the detailed nature of line by line coding produces multiple instances of codes (Urquhart, 2013: 159) and these are easily quantifiable using computer aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS).”
Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review (2020, background): “How do they define it, from the cessation of analysis angle (Urquhart, 2012), theoretical perspective (theory development)(Glaser & Strauss, 1967) or when all theoretical constructs are fully captured in the data (Starks and Trinidad (2007) as articulated by Saunders et al. (2018), data adequacy…”
The implications of the sharing economy for transport (2019, methodology): “The article analysis method involved a grounded approach that examined the main conceptual emphasis of each article and its stated aims (Urquhart, 2012).”
Teacher collaboration for change: sharing, improving, and spreading (2020, methodology): “GTM is well suited to theorising complex processes (Urquhart 2013, Charmaz 2014) like initiating, leading, and implementing collaborative professional learning and change.”
Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems (2019, methodology): “Finally, we conducted a selective coding based on the theoretical constructs of the S-D framework (Lusch and Nambisan 2015) and dynamic process of boundary objects (Star 2010) to derive core categories that are robust along all three cases describing value co-creation practices (Urquhart 2012).”