Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology

By Mihail C. Roco, William Sims Bainbridge. 2001

528 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a09c3c86670ac59f9f94a14e10a45c9f1ec78ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Eckelman
2. Julie Zimmerman
3. P. Anastas
4. David H. Guston
5. Elvira Uyarra

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ (2014, background): “Reports on societal implications (e.g. Roco and Bainbridge, 2001, 2005), which are derived from workshops in 2000 and 2003, respectively, explored greater breadth and detail and presumably informed the 2004 strategic plan.”
• Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. (2003, background): “The second mode, known as the ‘grand challenges’, supports specific visionary R&D activities identified as having the potential to realize significant economic and societal implications [74,75].”
• Toward Green Nano (2008, background): “E -factor Analysis of Nanomaterials Production There have been many calls for research into the potential environmental effects of new nanomaterials, several specifying life cycle approaches (Roco and Bainbridge 2001; Reijnders 2006; Sweet and Strohm 2006).”