Spatial pattern in the occurrence of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in managed and virgin boreal forests

By W. Gu, M. Kuusinen, T. Konttinen, Ilkka Hanski. 2001

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49f7a4bb55bb439dfa9fdfee606986dcb2ec3898

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Rydin
2. P. Johansson
3. Tord Snäll
4. M. Niklasson
5. C. Ellis
6. J. Ehrlén
7. Swantje Löbel
8. S. Nilsson

In Insect Science

1. C. Ellis
2. Robert Swihart
3. W. Gu
4. R. Penttilä
5. Ilkka Hanski
6. M. Niklasson
7. S. Nilsson
8. P. Johansson

In Plant Science

1. P. Johansson
2. H. Rydin
3. M. Niklasson
4. Tord Snäll
5. C. Ellis
6. Swantje Löbel
7. Erik Öckinger
8. S. Nilsson

Citations in the corpus

• Is local distribution of the epiphytic lichen Lobaria pulmonaria limited by dispersal capacity or habitat quality? (2005, result): “The restricted long-distance dispersal is in accordance with the findings of Gu et al. (2001), who studied the spatial occurrence pattern of L. pulmonaria.”
• Contrasting functional traits maintain lichen epiphyte diversity in response to climate and autogenic succession (2006, background): “The sensitivity of lichen epiphytes to environmental change (Ferry et al., 1973; Rose, 1988; Lesica et al., 1991; Gu et al., 2001; Pykälä, 2004) has resulted in their wide use as indicators for pollution monitoring (Hawksworth & Rose, 1970) and to identify forest habitats for biodiversity…”
• Conservation strategies for lichens: insights from population biology (2009, background): “Gu et al. (2001) explained a reduced frequency of L. pulmonaria in managed forests with the disruption of habitat continuity in the latter.”
• Consequences of forest fragmentation for polyporous fungi at two spatial scales (2006, methodology): “Second, we use the modelling approach described by Gu et al. (2002) to predict the consequences of increasing loss of connectivity (i.”
• Influence of habitat quantity, quality and isolation on the distribution and abundance of two epiphytic lichens (2003, background): “Isolation and landscape configuration are common predictors of species incidence although there are still few examples of this for lichens (but see Quintana-Ascencio & Menges 1996; Gu et al. 2001).”
• Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape (2005, background): “The restricted dispersal range has also been verified based on occupancy patterns (Gu et al. 2001, Hed- enås et al. 2003, Johansson and Ehrlén 2003), spatial genetic structure (Appelgren and Cronberg 1999, Snäll et al. 2004a), and establishment experiments (Sillett et al. 2000).”
• Bryophytes in a changing landscape: The hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes (2007, background): “…taxa alike typically invoke dispersal limitation as the causal demographic mechanism for reduced population densities in isolated habitats (Billet et al, 2000; Gu et al., 2001; Dettki et al., 2002; Johansson and Ehrlen, 2003; Snail et al., 2003; Ockinger et al., 2005; Zartman and Nascimento, 2006).”
• Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch‐tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal (2003, background): “The a estimate for the epiphytic lichen Lobaria pulmonaria has been reported to be 0.01 (Gu et al. 2001, transformed into meters), but it is difficult to compare the estimates because of the different analytic approaches.”
• Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models (2004, methodology): “For logistic regression models of habitat suitability, spatial autocorrelation in explanatory variables has been incorporated to enhance precision of parameter estimation (Besag, 1974, Augustin et al., 1996, Gu et al., 2001, Klute et al., 2002).”
• Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes – evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo‐nemoral forests (2006, background): “Many studies have reported a positive effect of tree diameter on the occurrence of individual epiphyte species (Uliczka and Angelstam 1999, Gu et al. 2001, Snäll et al. 2003), but there are also records of species which were not, or even negatively, affected by DBH (Hazell et al. 1998, Hedenås and…”