Analyzing the Vulnerability of Critical Infrastructure to Attack and Planning Defenses

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A bilevel mixed-integer program for critical infrastructure protection planning (2008, background): “Whereas interdiction problems have received vast attention in the literature, the more complex problem which includes an additional level of protection has only been fleetingly mentioned by a few authors [9,7].”
Defending Critical Infrastructure (2006, methodology): “Brown et al. (2005b) present a more complex instance involving theater ballistic missile defense.”
Planning for Disruptions in Supply Chain Networks (2006, background): “Worst-Case Cost The concept of protection against worst-case losses for network models has been briefly discussed in [14, 74].”
Stackelberg vs. Nash in Security Games: An Extended Investigation of Interchangeability, Equivalence, and Uniqueness (2011, methodology): “Several examples of applications of Stackelberg games to model terrorist attacks on electric power grids, subways, airports, and other critical infrastructure were described by Brown et al. (2005) and Sandler and Arce M. (2003).”