International Reserves: Precautionary vs. Mercantilist Views, Theory and Evidence

By Joshua Aizenman, Jaewoo Lee. Social Science Research Network, 2005

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper compares the importance of precautionary and mercantilist motives in the hoarding of international reserves by developing countries. Overall, empirical results support precautionary motives; in particular, a more liberal capital account regime increases international reserves. Theoretically, large precautionary demand for international reserves arises as a self-insurance to avoid costly liquidation of long-term projects when the economy is susceptible to sudden stops. The welfare gain from the optimal management of international reserves is of a first-order magnitude, reducing the welfare cost of liquidity shocks from a first-order to a second-order magnitude.

Subfields: Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49d405e205ef99b2b6ac33dfd58b915110a45c72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

  1. Yin-Wong Cheung
  2. Olivier Jeanne
  3. Hiro Ito
  4. M. Chinn
  5. Joshua Aizenman
  6. Anton Korinek
  7. Barry Eichengreen
  8. P. Gourinchas

In Strategy and Management

  1. Olivier Jeanne
  2. Hiro Ito
  3. P. Gourinchas

Citations in the corpus