From ADHD to SAD: Analyzing the Language of Mental Health on Twitter through Self-Reported Diagnoses

By Glen A. Coppersmith, Mark Dredze, Craig Harman, Kristy Hollingshead. CLPsych@HLT-NAACL, 2015

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many significant challenges exist for the mental health field, but one in particular is a lack of data available to guide research. Language provides a natural lens for studying mental health ‐ much existing work and therapy have strong linguistic components, so the creation of a large, varied, language-centric dataset could provide significant grist for the field of mental health research. We examine a broad range of mental health conditions in Twitter data by identifying self-reported statements of diagnosis. We systematically explore language differences between ten conditions with respect to the general population, and to each other. Our aim is to provide guidance and a roadmap for where deeper exploration is likely to be fruitful.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49d271c1cb6b0f11c1495567e8c13dacd854f589

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Andrew Yates
  2. Nazli Goharian
  3. Arman Cohan
  4. Margaret L. Kern

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Nazli Goharian
  2. Arman Cohan
  3. Andrew Yates
  4. Lyle Ungar
  5. Anind K. Dey
  6. Bingsheng Yao
  7. Diana Inkpen
  8. Johannes C. Eichstaedt

In Social Psychology

  1. Lyle Ungar
  2. Anind K. Dey
  3. Andrew Yates
  4. Bingsheng Yao
  5. Nazli Goharian
  6. Diana Inkpen
  7. Xuhai Xu
  8. Dakuo Wang

Citations in the corpus