A note on randomized response models for quantitative data
By S. Bar-Lev, Elizabeta Bobovitch, B. Boukai. 2004
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49b1eb523b7faf886bdc6d5f8c64271558013c39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Unbiased estimators of mean, variance and sensitivity level for quantitative characteristics in finite population sampling (2010, background): “In recent years, many improvements and enhancements have significantly increased the value and acceptance of the RR approaches, see Bhargava and Singh (2000); Chua and Tsui (2000); Padmawar and Vijayan (2000); Singh et al. (2000, 2001); Chaudhuri (2001); Bar-Lev et al. (2004) ; Chaudhuri (2004) and”
- An Efficiency and Protection Degree-Based Comparison Among the Quantitative Randomized Response Strategies (2008, methodology): “To encourage cooperation of the respondents and truthful answers, and to procure trustworthy data for estimating the proportion of people bearing a socially disapproved characteristic in a community, Warner (1965) first introduced a procedure called the randomized response technique for collecting d”