Strings in $AdS_{3}$ and SL(2,R) WZW Model, 1

By J. Maldacena, Hirosi Ooguri. 2000

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4984aeabda833cf46281ec1c8ce9c3a54bf737a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Gaberdiel
2. S. Giombi
3. J. Maldacena
4. N. Beisert
5. Rajesh Gopakumar
6. S. Frolov
7. A. Tseytlin
8. G. Arutyunov

Citations in the corpus

• A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2 (2017, background): “12) reduces to well known results in string theory on AdS3 [28,6], such as, [8],”
• Higher spin gravity with matter in AdS3 and its CFT dual (2011, background): “With a few exceptions, such as the purely NS-NS background of AdS3 [2], in which case the dual CFT is singular [3, 4], generally the bulk string theory involves Ramond-Ramond fluxes; even the free string spectrum is difficult to solve, and the full string field theory appears to be out of reach at t”
• LSZ in LST (2004, unknown): “This phenomenon was noticed in [29,30], and given this interpretation in [3].”
• Hidden Symmetries of the AdS_5 x S^5 Superstring (2003, background): “[18], may be applicable to gauge theories, but in some ways this example is rather different.”
• Tensionless string spectra on AdS3 (2018, background): “The no-ghost theorem implies that j has to satisfy the Maldacena-Ooguri (MO) bound [5] which, for k = 1, takes the form 1 2 < j < k + 1 2 = 1 .”
• Liouville Field Theory — A decade after the revolution (2004, unknown): “Some references are [245], [246], [247], [248], [249], [250], [251], [252], [253], [254], [130], [255], [256], [257], [258], [259], [260].”
• Stringy effects in scrambling (2014, unknown): “[47–51].”
• The worldsheet dual of the symmetric product CFT (2018, methodology): “In fact, from the WZW perspective, the worldsheet generator J3 0 is identied with the compact Cartan generator J3 0 = L WZW 1 + L WZW 1 of the WZW group SL(2;R), see the discussion around eq. (8) of [1]. On the other hand, with respect to the spacetime Mobius group, the correct identication is J3 0 ”