Observation of eight-photon entanglement

By Xing-Can Yao, Tian-Xiong Wang, Ping Xu, He Lu, Ge-Sheng Pan, Xiao-Hui Bao, Cheng-Zhi Peng, Chaoyang Lu, Yu-Ao Chen, Jian-Wei Pan. Nature Photonics, 2011

410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The creation of increasingly large multipartite entangled states is not only a fundamental scientific endeavour in itself1,2,3, but is also the enabling technology for quantum information4,5. Tremendous experimental effort has been devoted to generating multiparticle entanglement with a growing number of qubits6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. So far, up to six spatially separated single photons10,11,12,13,14 have been entangled based on parametric downconversion17. Multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon have been exploited to generate forms of hyper-entangled states18,19. Here, using new ultra-bright sources of entangled photon pairs20, an eight-photon interferometer and post-selection detection, we demonstrate for the first time the creation of an eight-photon Schrödinger cat state1 with genuine multipartite entanglement. The ability to control eight individual photons represents a step towards optical quantum computation, and will enable new experiments on, for example, quantum simulation21,22, topological error correction23 and testing entanglement dynamics under decoherence24. Researchers demonstrate the creation of an eight-photon Schrödinger-cat state with genuine multipartite entanglement by developing noise-reduction multiphoton interferometer and post-selection detection. The ability to control eight individual photons will enable new multiphoton entanglement experiments in previously inaccessible parameter regimes.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4984a246b84a938e6ab35906a6f39a330d8ea83c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Citations in the corpus

Macroscopic quantum states: Measures, fragility, and implementations (2017, methodology): “Yao et al. (2012) used type II converters pumped by short pulses together with narrow filters of the output photons to erase their frequency correlations.”
Entanglement certification from theory to experiment (2018, background): “Subsequent experiments haves since extended this idea of “entanglement through information erasure”, entangling four [201], six [202], eight [203], ten [204], and most recently, a record twelve photons [205] in their polarisation.”
Direct generation of three-photon polarization entanglement (2014, background): “[11] X.”
Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward (2012, neutral): “…ratiotoalevelthatmadetheexperimentpossible,weusedthefollow-ingadvancedtechniques:afrequency-uncorrelatedpolarization-entangledphotonpairsource 26–28 , ultra-low-noise large-active-area single-photon detectors at Bob 29 , and entanglement-assisted clock synchronization 13,14,17 .”
Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states. (2013, background): “When it comes to measurement-based QC, optical CV cluster states [5, 6] oﬀer a distinct advantage over their optical-qubit counterparts [7, 8] because they are much easier to make experimentally [9–11].”
On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources (2013, methodology): “Bulk crystal spontaneous pair sources have been used successfully in the largest optical quantum information experiments to date[27], including the production[30] and manipulation[31] of 8-photon entanglement.”
Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain (2013, background): “Previously, the largest cluster state consisted of 8 photonic qubits [5] or light modes [6], while the largest multipartite entangled state of any sort involved 14 trapped ions [7].”
Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review (2019, neutral): “98).”