Are autochthonous foods more important than allochthonous resources to benthic consumers in tropical headwater streams?
By D. Lau, K. Leung, D. Dudgeon. Journal of The North American Benthological Society, 2009
153 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4980c318c891d87c179f6ab96c4990a60d6c0ec7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Attached Algae: The Cryptic Base of Inverted Trophic Pyramids in Freshwaters (2017, background): “Algae in the lineage arising from the second incorporation of endosymbionts synthesize the longer chain EFAs de novo (Falkowski et al. 2004).”
- Are tropical streams really different? (2009, background): “These studies highlight the importance of distinguishing between assimilated and consumed food through stable isotopes and gut content analyses to obtain a reliable picture of the stream food web (Mantel et al. 2004, Lau et al. 2009a).”
- High-quality algae attached to leaf litter boost invertebrate shredder growth (2016, background): “Algae are much higher quality food than allochthonous leaf litter for stream invertebrates because they have a higher content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), in particular ω3 PUFAs (Torres-Ruiz et al. 2007, Lau et al. 2009).”
- How important are terrestrial organic carbon inputs for secondary production in freshwater ecosystems (2017, background): “Stream studies suggest that even when allochthonous inputs greatly dominate invertebrate and fish production is very preferentially supported by algal basal resources (Brito et al., 2006; Bunn et al., 2003; Lau et al., 2009a; Mayer & Likens, 1987).”