General considerations for lung function testing
By Martin R Miller, R. Crapo, J. Hankinson, V. Brusasco, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, A. Coates, P. Enright, C. P. Grinten, P. Gustafsson and 9 more. European Respiratory Journal, 2005
2,087 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4976969b049f47471fe2e0b883de64ddbb639c7b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- H. Reddel
- L. Bacharier
- E. D. Bateman
- H. Kerstjens
- D. Robin Taylor
- A. Boner
- L. Boulet
- K. Carlsen
Citations in the corpus
- Performance of a Natural Language Processing (NLP) Tool to Extract Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) Reports from Structured and Semistructured Veteran Affairs (VA) Data (2016, methodology): “The interpretation of lung function tests involves two tasks: (1) the classification of the measured FEV1, FVC, and bronchodilator response with respect to a reference population based on the patient’s age, height and gender; and (2) the integration of the obtained values into the diagnosis.(3) Whil”
- An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice. (2009, methodology): “There are no standardized methods for recording ambulatory spirometric data, but basic guidelines for laboratory-based testing can be applied (116).”
- Diagnosis and treatment of asthma in childhood: a PRACTALL consensus report (2007, background): “b-agonist reversibility may provide information about the reversibility of airflow limitation (127).”