Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design

By S. Kamper, Christopher G. Maher, Grant Mackay. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2009

1,316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/496d796539d574725e7ff6b1bb81ee034d5975cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. P. Choi
2. E. Wan
3. B. Hui

In General Health Professions

1. E. P. Choi
2. E. Wan
3. B. Hui

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. P. Choi
2. E. Wan
3. B. Hui

Citations in the corpus

• How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods (2020, background): “These anchors are well-studied and applicable to a wide range of patients [78].”
• Depression and Anxiety in Hong Kong during COVID-19 (2020, methodology): “It is suggested that the global rating of change scale has the advantages of clinical relevance, adequate reproducibility, and sensitivity to change and is easy to understand by respondents [17].”