Length–weight and length–length relationships for 10 pelagic fish species from the Adriatic Sea (Croatia)
By G. Sinovčić, M. Franičević, B. Zorica, V. Čikeš‐Keč. 2004
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/494e30df962f931d9d51f9fd9e0531952c76d624
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Molecular Biology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Length-Weight Relationship of 10 Fish Species Caught by Bottom Trawl and Midwater Trawl from the Middle Black Sea, Turkey (2007, methodology): “…relationship for fish species in the Portuguese waters, the Adriatic Sea, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and the North Aegean Sea (Santos et al., 2002; Mendes et al., 2004; Dulcic and Kraljevic, 1996; Sinovcic et al., 2004; Morato et al., 2001; Morey et al., 2003; Filiz and Bilge, 2004).”
- Length–weight and length–length relationships of some small indigenous fish species from the Mathabhanga River, southwestern Bangladesh (2006, background): “Length–weight relationships (LWRs) are needed to estimate weight from length because direct weight measurements can be time-consuming in the field (Martin-Smith, 1996; Koutrakis and Tsikliras, 2003; Sinovcic et al., 2004); these parameters are important in fish biology and can provide information on”