Forest moth taxa as indicators of lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment

By K. Summerville, Lisa M. Ritter, T. O. Crist. 2004

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/494b19bb989dc13e0b8223734b0497b0992dd6e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. N. Hilt
2. K. Fiedler
3. T. New
4. Katherine A. Eschelbach
5. K. Saarinen
6. G. Hess
7. F. Koch
8. M. Rubino

In Genetics

1. N. Hilt
2. K. Fiedler
3. T. New
4. K. Saarinen
5. F. Koch
6. Christine Truxa
7. N. Blüthgen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Hilt
2. K. Fiedler
3. T. New
4. Anu Valtonen
5. Katherine A. Eschelbach
6. K. Saarinen
7. G. Hess
8. F. Koch

Citations in the corpus

• Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) and conservation: background and perspective (2004, background): “…considerably higher than feasible in most temperate regions (but see the similar approach promoted for deciduous forest of eastern North America by Summerville et al. 2004), using the premise that in any area different moth groups will exhibit different levels of endemism and site/ habitat…”
• Diversity and composition of Arctiidae moth ensembles along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian Andes (2005, background): “Such species can even serve as disturbance indicators (Holloway, 1985; Kitching et al., 2000; Summerville et al., 2004).”
• Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: Does road type affect diversity and abundance? (2005, background): “, Arctiidae, Notodontidae) can be used as indicators for species richness and habitat disturbance (Summerville et al., 2004).”
• Attraction to light - from how far do moths (Lepidoptera) return to weak artificial sources of light? (2012, background): “Moths are increasingly being used as indicators of habitat quality or biodiversity (Kitching et al., 2000; Summerville et al., 2004; Beck et al., 2011b).”
• Co-variation and indicators of species diversity: Can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? (2006, background): “Studies on the co-variation of species richness between different taxa and on the overlap of species richness hot spots have mainly been carried out in national and regional scales (e.g. Prendergast et al., 1993; Gaston and David, 1994; Kerr, 1997; Prendergast and Eversham, 1997; van Jaarsveld et al”
• Recommendations for Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogate Species Approaches (2006, background): “Partially Effective 2 17 6 25 Carroll et al. 2003; Rubino Kremen 1992; Ryti 1992; Oliver and Beattie 1996; Niemi et al. 1997; Chase et al. 2000; Moritz 2001; Bonn et al. 2002; Negi and Gadgil 2002; Ranius 2002; Lawler et al. 2003; Manne and Williams 2003; Cardoso et al. 2004; Kati et al. 2004; Su et”