On the calculation of deflections in structural stainless steel beams: an experimental and numerical investigation
By E. Mirambell, E. Real. 2000
536 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49483ca4310c3b27c0416fdc859a2791d0233645
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Civil and Structural Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Material properties and residual stresses of cold-formed high strength steel hollow sections (2015, methodology): “However, the model overestimates the stresses after thematerial yielding (Mirambell and Real [32], Gardner and Nethercot [33], Rasmussen [34]).”
- Strength enhancements in cold-formed structural sections - Part I: Material testing (2013, methodology): “05 [20] or the 0.”
- Residual stress analysis of structural stainless steel sections (2008, unknown): “The development of this model for stainless steel stress-strain behaviour, from its origins in 1943 to the more recently adopted two-stage versions, is given in the following references [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31].”
- Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel alloys (2010, methodology): “This observation led to the proposal [34] and modification and development of [35,4042] the two-stage compound Ramberg-Osgood material model.”
- Cross-section stability of lean duplex stainless steel welded I-sections (2013, methodology): “9 Numerous material models have been applied to represent the nonlinear stress-strain relationship of stainless steel, the most popular being the basic Ramberg-Osgood model [22, 23] or variations thereof [11-13, 24, 25].”
- Experiments on stainless steel hollow sections—Part 1: Material and cross-sectional behaviour (2004, background): “Mirambell & Real’s proposal was to use the basic RambergOsgood expression, given by Equation 1, up to the 0.2% proof stress, and a modified Ramberg-Osgood expression, given by Equation 2, between the 0.2% proof stress and the ultimate stress of the material.”
- Structural design for non-linear metallic materials (2006, methodology): “Observing the value of Mirambell and Real’s proposal, but noting that it could not be applied to compressive material behaviour (due to the absence of an ultimate stress) and that greater accuracy at strains of general structural interest could be achieved with an alternative model, it was proposed ”
- Numerical Modeling of Stainless Steel Structural Components—A Consistent Approach (2004, methodology): “In their proposed model, Mirambell and Real (2000) adopted the basic Ramberg-Osgood expression up to the 0.”
- Description of stress-strain curves for stainless steel alloys (2015, methodology): “Different authors (Mirambell and Real [7], Rasmussen and Hancock [36], Real et al. [4] and Arrayago et al. [5]) have already suggested that using the 0.05% proof stress instead of 0.01%, as given by Eq.”
- Stress-strain curves for hot-rolled steels (2017, background): “This observation led to several studies aimed at improving the model at large strains [22-24].”