Sub-Sampled Newton Methods I: Globally Convergent Algorithms

By Farbod Roosta-Khorasani, Michael W. Mahoney. 2016

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Large scale optimization problems are ubiquitous in machine learning and data analysis and there is a plethora of algorithms for solving such problems. Many of these algorithms employ sub-sampling, as a way to either speed up the computations and/or to implicitly implement a form of statistical regularization. In this paper, we consider second-order iterative optimization algorithms and we provide bounds on the convergence of the variants of Newton's method that incorporate uniform sub-sampling as a means to estimate the gradient and/or Hessian. Our bounds are non-asymptotic and quantitative. Our algorithms are global and are guaranteed to converge from any initial iterate. Using random matrix concentration inequalities, one can sub-sample the Hessian to preserve the curvature information. Our first algorithm incorporates Hessian sub-sampling while using the full gradient. We also give additional convergence results for when the sub-sampled Hessian is regularized by modifying its spectrum or ridge-type regularization. Next, in addition to Hessian sub-sampling, we also consider sub-sampling the gradient as a way to further reduce the computational complexity per iteration. We use approximate matrix multiplication results from randomized numerical linear algebra to obtain the proper sampling strategy. In all these algorithms, computing the update boils down to solving a large scale linear system, which can be computationally expensive. As a remedy, for all of our algorithms, we also give global convergence results for the case of inexact updates where such linear system is solved only approximately. This paper has a more advanced companion paper, [42], in which we demonstrate that, by doing a finer-grained analysis, we can get problem-independent bounds for local convergence of these algorithms and explore trade-offs to improve upon the basic results of the present paper.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Nicolas Loizou
  2. Peter Richtárik
  3. Michael W. Mahoney
  4. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  5. Robert Mansel Gower
  6. Kurt Keutzer
  7. Katya Scheinberg
  8. Martin Takác

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Peter Richtárik
  2. Nicolas Loizou
  3. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  4. Katya Scheinberg
  5. Albert S. Berahas
  6. Frank E. Curtis
  7. Martin Takác
  8. Shusen Wang

In Numerical Analysis

  1. Nicolas Loizou
  2. Peter Richtárik
  3. Shusen Wang
  4. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  5. Raghu Bollapragada
  6. Jorge Nocedal
  7. Katya Scheinberg
  8. Frank E. Curtis

In Optimization & Training

  1. Peter Richtárik
  2. Nicolas Loizou
  3. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  4. Robert Mansel Gower
  5. Michael W. Mahoney
  6. Issam Hadj Laradji
  7. Katya Scheinberg
  8. Shusen Wang

Citations in the corpus