Public Choice of Species for the "Ark": Phylogenetic Similarity and Preferred Wildlife Species for Survival

By C. Tisdell, Clevo Wilson, H. S. Nantha. 2006

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Human preferences for species conservation: Animal charisma trumps endangered status (2017, background): “…that have explored the value given to species, all of them, to our knowledge, have relied on participants' self-reported hypothetical species choices or intentions to support a program (Gunnthorsdottir, 2001; Tisdell et al., 2006), rather than on their actual behaviour (i.e. real money invested).”
Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird - the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. (2007, unknown): “…2005), autochthony (Peretti, 1998), endangeredness (Rolston, 1997), naturalness (Götmark, 1992; Hunter, 1996; Machado, 2004), similarity to humans (Tisdell et al., 2006) and uniqueness (Vane-Wright et al., 1991; Montgomery, 2002), whilst others address the relationship between several of these…”