Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity
By J. Assunção, Maitreesh Ghatak. 2003
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/492aeba50ae0eba6f864ed0ab2bde4570624e284
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- C. Carletto
- A. Zezza
- S. Savastano
- Christopher B. Barrett
- K. Abay
- K. Otsuka
- Stein T. Holden
- Anna Josephson
In Soil Science
- C. Carletto
- A. Zezza
- S. Savastano
- Christopher B. Barrett
- K. Abay
- K. Otsuka
- Anna Josephson
- J. Michler
Citations in the corpus
- Fact or artefact : the impact of measurement errors on the farm size - productivity relationship (2011, background): “Assunçao and Ghatak (2003) demonstrate how theoretically unobserved heterogeneity in farmer quality may explain the observed differences in productivity.”
- Land productivity and plot size : is measurement error driving the inverse relationship ? (2017, unknown): “…intuitive, explanation for the farm-size IR is missing land, labor, credit, or insurance markets; missing markets have been found to explain differences in land productivity between households (Assunção and Ghatak, 2003; Barrett, 1996; Carter and Wiebe, 1990; Eswaran and Kotwal, 1986; Feder, 1985).”