Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods.

By Charles W. Fox, Mary Ellen Czesak. Annual Review of Entomology, 2000

804 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/491f26c5c52dab82b0931ddd0969e0b818b8499d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The effects of experience on host acceptance in ovipositing moths (2005, background): “The acceptance decision can include considerations over the number of eggs (clutch size) (Mangel 1987, Pilson & Rausher 1988, I, II), or the quality of the eggs (Fox & Czesak 2000, VI) laid.”
Mountain Pine Beetle Voltinism and Life History Characteristics across Latitudinal and Elevational Gradients in the Western United States (2014, background): “A main driver of adult emergence timing is development rate, a key fitness trait that results from temperature-dependent processes that can also influence adult size and fecundity (Fox and Czesak 2000, Kingsolver and Huey 2008).”
Parental effects in Pieris rapae in response to variation in food quality: adaptive plasticity across generations? (2003, background): “…studies have manipulated parental and progeny environments reciprocally; such manipulations allow for the assessment of the adaptive value of parental effects by comparing the consequences of variation in the parental environment for their progeny (Fox & Czesak, 2000; LaMontagne & McCauley, 2001).”
When is a maternal effect adaptive (2007, background): “Journal compilation # 2007 Oikos Subject Editor: Tim Benton, Accepted 3 September 2007 brood, or a maternal size-body size correlation) have no adaptive value and are more likely to be physiological side effects (Heath and Blouw 1998, Fox and Czesak 2000).”
Mothers reduce egg provisioning with age (2003, methodology): “…of the adaptive significance of a decrease in reproductive investment per egg with age will require some form of genetic selection or direct manipulative approaches such as physical and physiological manipulations (for specific examples see Sinervo & Licht 1991; Stearns 1992 and Fox & Czesak 2000).”
Bergmann and Converse Bergmann Latitudinal Clines in Arthropods: Two Ends of a Continuum?1 (2004, background): “, 2001), and smaller egg (and cell) sizes at higher temperatures have been experimentally demonstrated in a few insect species (Ernsting and Isaaks, 1997, 2000; Blanckenhorn, 2000b; Fox and Czesak, 2000; Fischer et al., 2003).”
Assessing larval food quality for phytophagous insects: are the facts as simple as they appear? (2006, background): “They often demonstrate that within a species, small eggs are less likely to hatch ( Fox & Czesak 2000 and references therein).”
Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits (2017, positive): “For instance, egg size varies enormously between species (Fox & Czesak 2000) and affects hatching success (Fischer et al. 2006) and resistance to desiccation (Fischer et al. 2006) and heat (Liefting et al. 2010).”