Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials

By I. Lapczyk, J. Hurtado. 2007

1,063 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A phantom node formulation with mixed mode cohesive law for splitting in laminates (2009, methodology): “For this purpose, several continuum damage models have been developed (e.g., Lapczyk and Hurtado 2007; Laurin et al. 2007; Maimi et al. 2007; Matzenmiller et al. 1995; Pinho et al. 2006).”
A combined elastoplastic damage model for progressive failure analysis of composite materials and structures (2012, methodology): “[1–6]).”
A procedure for superposing linear cohesive laws to represent multiple damage mechanisms in the fracture of composites (2009, background): “In damage models such as the cohesive elements in AbaqusandtheAbaqusProgressiveDamageModelfor Composites ( Lapczyk and Hurtado 2007 ), objectivity of the solution is achieved by representing a material’s softeningresponsewithalinearsofteninglawwitharea equal to the critical energy release rate of th”
Continuum Models for the Analysis of Progressive Failure in Composite Laminates (2009, methodology): “[10] and Lapczyk and Hurtado [11] already proposed to use artificial viscosity, but only to improve stability of the simulation.”
A three-dimensional plasticity-damage constitutive model for timber under cyclic loads (2018, methodology): “This matrix 535 is employed in the calculation of the global structural tangent sti↵ness matrix, which ensures the robustness of the Newton-Raphson method by maintaining its quadratic convergence rate [35].”