Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.

By A. Horvath. Clinical Chemistry, 2009

667 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48e532b8c8bfca5d740c4b1c62b70caa83ed2513

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (2011, neutral): “Those applying GRADE to questions about diagnostic tests, to public health, or to health systems questions will face some special challenges [8,19].”
Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America. (2014, methodology): “…evidence was based on the IDSA Handbook on Clinical Practice Guideline Development and involved a systematic weighting of the quality of the evidence and the grade of recommendation using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system (Table 1) [1 – 4, 9, 10].”
Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update (2017, methodology): “The evidence and recommendations in the guideline have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system (Table 1) [5, 6].”
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: 2012 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2012, methodology): “The GRADE approach offers a structured, systematic, and transparent process to formulate recommendations on the basis of explicit criteria that go beyond just the quality of available evidence (Table 1 ) [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] .”
Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update (2015, background): “The GRADE system offers two grades of recommendation: strong (1) and weak (2) [1, 2] (Table 1).”
2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults. (2015, positive): “The expert panel followed a process used in the development of other IDSA guidelines, which included a systematic weighting of the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system [17 – 20] (Table 1).”
Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children (2017, methodology): “Grading, Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach [2, 3].”