The Century of the Gene
By E. Keller. 2000
528 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In a book that promises to change the way we think and talk about genes and genetic determinism, Evelyn Fox Keller, one of our most gifted historians and philosphers of science, provides a powerful, profound analysis of the achievements of genetics and molecular biology in the 20th century, the century of the gene. Not just a chronicle of biology's progress from gene to genome in 100 years, "The Century of the Gene" also calls attention to the surprising ways these advances challenge the familiar picture of the gene most of us still entertain. Keller shows us that the very successes that have stirred our imagination have also radically undermined the primacy of the gene - word and object - as the core explanatory concept of heredity and development. She argues that we need a new vocabulary that includes concepts such as robustness, fidelity and evolvability. But more than a new vocabulary, a new awareness is absolutely crucial: that understanding the components of a system (be they individual genes, proteins or even molecules) may tell us little about the interactions among these components. With the Human Genome Project nearing it first and most publicized goal, biologists are coming to realize that they have reached not the end of biology but the beginning of a new era. Indeed, Keller predicts that in the new century we will witness another Cambrian era, this time in new forms of biological thought rather than in new forms of biological life.
Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48d7918f577cadf75b419192434b1db5e709fece
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In History and Philosophy of Science
Citations in the corpus
- Biohackers: The Politics of Open Science (2013, background): “The informational metaphors that surround genetics have shaped scientists’ approach to genetics and have had a role in the rise of intellectual property rights in this field (Kay 2000; Keller 2000; Waldby 2000).”
- How Biology Became Social, and What it Means for Social Theory (2014, background): “…process of development, but as contextually dependent (and elusive) entities that cooperate extensively with a large variety of postgenomic factors (Keller, 2000; Oyama et al., 2001; Moss, 2003; Robert, 2004; Jablonka and Lamb, 2005; Griffiths and Stotz, 2007, 2013; Stotz, 2006, 2008; Dupré, 2012).”