Comparison of least-squares cross-validation bandwidth options for kernel home-range estimation

By Robert A. Gitzen, Joshua J. Millspaugh. 2003

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48cf3a8dde27d693da194b364ac244d533c29350

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. John M. Marzluff
2. M. Kelly
3. Joshua J. Millspaugh
4. Peter N. Laver
5. Robert A. Gitzen
6. B. J. Kernohan
7. P. Hurvitz
8. Jon S. Horne

Citations in the corpus

• Comparability of three analytical techniques to assess joint space use (2004, methodology): “Current advancements in kernel-based home-range estimates, in particular bandwidth selection, might help overcome some issues in kernel-density estimation (Gitzen and Millspaugh 2003).”
• A Critical Review of Home Range Studies (2008, methodology): “Gitzen and Millspaugh (2003) showed that the 1 E-mail: makelly2@vt.”
• RELATING RESOURCES TO A PROBABILISTIC MEASURE OF SPACE USE: FOREST FRAGMENTS AND STELLER'S JAYS (2004, methodology): “Although least squares cross-validation is commonly used to objectively define smoothing (Gitzen and Millspaugh 2003), other options including ‘‘plug-in’’ and ‘‘solve-theequation’’ are promising for defining the UD of animals with fine- and coarse-grained movement patterns (Kernohan et al. 2001).”