Investigation of Selected Baseline Removal Techniques as Candidates for Automated Implementation
By G. Schulze, A. Jirasek, Marcia M. L. Yu, A. Lim, R. Turner, M. Blades. Applied Spectroscopy, 2005
317 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48bac45834c18d26abc5953d6eac1eb34f3d93f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jinchao Liu
- Lorna Ashton
- Michael Foster
- Margarita Osadchy
- Shuo Chen
- Christopher J. Solomon
- Stuart James Gibson
- Quan Liu
Citations in the corpus
- Data Pre-processing (2009, unknown): “However, more sophisticated methods to perform this operation exist, such as wavelets ( Schulze et al. , 2005 ; Davis et al. , 2007 ) and iterative polynomial baseline fi tting (IPBF) ( Lieber and MahadevanJansen, 2003 ) to mention just two. ch002.indd 36 11/18/2008 2:15:54 PM IPBF uses the same…”
- Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Raman Spectrum Recognition: A Unified Solution (2017, methodology): “A detailed review and comparison of baseline correction methods can be found in Schulze et al.[7].”
- Review of Fluorescence Suppression Techniques in Raman Spectroscopy (2015, background): “The derivatives of the fluorescence background are always smaller in magnitude than those of Raman peaks; thus, taking the derivative of a measured Raman spectrum will eliminate the background components irrespective of their magnitudes and thus enhance the sharp Raman signal (90).”