What do packet dispersion techniques measure?
By C. Dovrolis, P. Ramanathan, David Moore. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213), 2001
681 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48b4ddcb752ef6c3ebfb8e00a7eb367bd414a4e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- C. Dovrolis
- R. Venkatesha Prasad
- K. Claffy
- Margaret Murray
- Manish Jain
- Peter Steenkiste
- Ningning Hu
- Yunhong Gu
Citations in the corpus
- UDT: UDP-based data transfer for high-speed wide area networks (2007, background): “One is the impact of cross traffic [19].”
- Nettimer: A Tool for Measuring Bottleneck Link Bandwidth (2001, background): “These tools, tcpanaly [Pax97], and pathrate [ DRM01 ] actively send their own probe trac, which”
- Bandwidth estimation: metrics, measurement techniques, and tools (2003, methodology): “[ 17 ] analyzes the local modes of the packet pair distribution and also used a lower bound of the path capacity measured with long packet trains.”
- End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP throughput (2002, methodology): “Recently, however, [7] showed that this is not the case.”
- Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques (2003, methodology): “MA, SLC [1], [2], SV, FC, SWEDEN, and NL are machines on commercial networks, and they are located in Massachusetts, Silicon Valley, Foster City, Sweden, and The Netherlands, respectively.”