A theoretical characterization of linear SVM-based feature selection
By D. Hardin, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Constantin F. Aliferis. 2004
67 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Constantin F. Aliferis
- Alexander R. Statnikov
- Ioannis Tsamardinos
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Subramani Mani
- Xenofon D. Koutsoukos
- Hongkai Sun
- Bilwaj Gaonkar
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Chengxiang Zhai
- Alexander R. Statnikov
- Ioannis Tsamardinos
- Subramani Mani
- Xenofon D. Koutsoukos
- Ding-Xuan Zhou
- Bilwaj Gaonkar
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Russell T. Shinohara
- Bilwaj Gaonkar
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Christos Davatzikos
- Chengxiang Zhai
- Hongkai Sun
- Ding-Xuan Zhou
- Subramani Mani
Citations in the corpus
- Interpreting support vector machine models for multivariate group wise analysis in neuroimaging (2015, positive): “…for interpreting SVM models Rasmussen et al. (2011) Guyon et al. (2002), it has been noted that using SVM weights can assign relatively low weights to significant features and relatively larger weights to irrelevant features Hardin et al. (2004) Cuingnet et al. (2011) Gaonkar and Davatzikos (2013).”
- A multiple kernel support vector machine scheme for feature selection and rule extraction from gene expression data of cancer tissue (2007, background): “also points out that in gene expression data even random gene subsets give good classification performance [32].”
- Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces Associated with Analytic Translation-Invariant Mercer Kernels (2008, background): “In some problems of feature selection [ 6 , 10] and manifold learning [2], data of derivatives may be available [9, 18].”
- A Survey of Text Classification Algorithms (2012, methodology): “Therefore, a number of techniques were proposed in [134] in order to learn the associations between the words and the categories.”
- Local Causal and Markov Blanket Induction for Causal Discovery and Feature Selection for Classification Part I: Algorithms and Empirical Evaluation (2010, methodology): “…to the above results we would add the arguments in favor of causal feature selection presented in Guyon et al. (2007) and recent theoretical (Hardin et al., 2004) and empirical (Statnikov et al., 2006) results that show that under the same sufficient conditions that make Markov blanket the…”
- A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis (2004, unknown): “On the other hand, the SVM algorithm may assign non-zero weights to weakly relevant variables [ Hardin2004 ] which explains why effective variable selection can still improve SVM classification.”