Welfare Rankings in the Presence of Contaminated Data

55 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Robust stochastic dominance: A semi-parametric approach (2007, methodology): “(a) q; q0 1 : see Cowell and Victoria-Feser [5, 6], Theorem 2. b) q 1 < q0: We have to integrate with respect to eF the quantity Cðq0Þ qxq cq þ ðxq zÞ½z xq þ Dðq0Þ ðx1 zÞ½ qxq cq þ ðxq zÞ½z xq þ Eðq0Þ 1 Mð Þ ðz; ; x1 Þ ðz > x1 Þ½ qxq cq þ ðxq zÞ½z xq þ ðx1 zÞ½ ½z x1 qxq cq þ ðxq zÞ½z xq which gives ”
Statistical Methods for Distributional Analysis (2015, methodology): “If the support of the income distribution is bounded below then the problems with contaminated data are going to occur only in the upper tail of the distribution (Cowell and Victoria-Feser 2002).”
The Measurement of Economic Inequality (2009, background): “5 See Cowell and Flachaire (2007), Cowell and Victoria-Feser (1996, 2002) , van Praag et al. (1983),”
WEALTH INEQUALITY: A SURVEY (2015, unknown): “Cowell and Victoria-Feser (1996) and Cowell and Victoria-Feser (2002) demonstrate the non-robustness of relative inequality measures and of Lorenz dominance comparisons.”