On Low-Dimensional Solvmanifolds
By Christoph Bock. 2009
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A nilmanifold resp. solvmanifold is a compact homogeneous space of a connected and simply-connected nilpotent resp. solvable Lie group by a lattice, i.e. a discrete co-compact subgroup. There is an easy criterion for nilpotent Lie groups which enables one to decide whether there is a lattice or not. Moreover, it is easy to decide whether a nilmanifold is formal, Kaehlerian or (Hard) Lefschetz. The study of solvmanifolds meets with noticeably greater obstacles than the study of nilmanifolds. Even the construction of solvmanifolds is considerably more difficult than is the case for nilmanifolds. The reason is that there is no simple criterion for the existence of a lattice in a connected and simply-connected solvable Lie group. We consider the question of existence of lattices in solvable Lie groups up to dimension six and examine whether the corresponding solvmanifolds are formal, symplectic, Kaehler or (Hard) Lefschetz.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48982b5659efd3dbd2281c9a676887492dbcdb30
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- Anna Fino
- Fabio Paradiso
- L. Ugarte
- A. Otal
- Luigi Vezzoni
- Adriano Tomassini
- Sonke Rollenske
- R. Villacampa
Citations in the corpus
- Lattices in almost abelian Lie groups with locally conformal Kähler or symplectic structures (2016, unknown): “7), using the criterion for the existence of lattices in almost abelian Lie groups given in [7].”
- Balanced Hermitian structures on almost abelian Lie algebras (2020, background): “By [35] (see also [11, 16]), the same is true and for the Lie groups corresponding to the Lie algebras b8 (for some values of the parameters p, r) and b9.”
- Six-Dimensional Solvmanifolds with Holomorphically Trivial Canonical Bundle (2014, background): “Moreover, using some results in [6], we ensure in Proposition 2.”