Hubble Space Telescope STIS Ultraviolet Spectral Evidence of Outflow in Extreme Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies. II. Modeling and Interpretation

By K. Leighly. 2004

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present modeling to explore the conditions of the broad-line-emitting gas in two extreme narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies, using the observational results described in the first paper of this series. Photoionization modeling using CLOUDY was conducted for the broad blueshifted wind lines and the narrow, symmetric, rest-wavelength-centered disk lines separately. A broad range of physical conditions was explored for the wind component, and a figure of merit was used to quantitatively evaluate the simulation results. Of the three minima in the figure-of-merit parameter space, we favor the solution characterized by an X-ray-weak continuum, elevated abundances, a small column density (log NH ≈ 21.4), a relatively high ionization parameter (log U ≈ -1.2 to -0.2), a wide range of densities (log n ≈ 7-11), and a covering fraction of ~0.15. The presence of low-ionization emission lines implies that the disk component is optically thick to the continuum, and the Si III]/C III] ratio implies a density of 1010-1010.25 cm-3. A low ionization parameter (log U = -3) is inferred for the intermediate-ionization lines, unless the continuum is "filtered" through the wind before illuminating the intermediate-line-emitting gas, in which case log U = -2.1. The location of the emission regions was inferred from the photoionization modeling and a simple "toy" dynamical model. A large black hole mass (1.3 × 108 M☉) radiating at 11% of the Eddington luminosity is consistent with the kinematics of both the disk and wind lines, and an emission radius of ~104 RS is inferred for both. We compare these results with previous work and discuss implications.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4875ac0ad583e401f7572dd4cb143c32f427c2c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Luis C. Ho
  2. Gordon Richards
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. Hans-Walter Rix
  6. Jenny E. Greene
  7. F. Walter
  8. H. Netzer

Citations in the corpus