Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks
By Roger M. Cooke. 2003
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/486d069b319707da2de8084bea0f4a3f8e752b9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
In Statistics and Probability
- William Oberkampf
- Laura Painton Swiler
- Jon C. Helton
- T. Trucano
- Jay D. Johnson
- Martin Pilch
- Takera Igusa
- Scott Ferson
Citations in the corpus
- Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: What's what (2006, background): “The learning goal here is to expand the information beyond the training data set by using domain experts (see [64-66]).”
- An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions (2003, background): “Although such uncertainty characterizations may be obtained, at least in part, from direct experimentation and observation, most real analyses require some type of expert review and assessment process to convert available information into a mathematical form that is suitable for further analysis [74”
- Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—an interdisciplinary literature review (2018, background): “Bifurcation theory is still used today in mathematics, physics, complex systems science, and related fields. In the social sciences, tipping points originated much later to address neighborhood dynamics of racial segregation in political science (Grodzins 1957), sociology/urban planning (Wolf 1963),”