A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization
By G. Rozvany. 2009
1,148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48646e621d6c4c4173b9f64ae0e3f504392c75d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Ole Sigmund
- Krishnan Suresh
- Kurt Maute
- Zhan Kang
- Glaucio H. Paulino
- Ramana V. Grandhi
- Joshua D. Deaton
- Amir M. Mirzendehdel
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Krishnan Suresh
- Ole Sigmund
- Zhan Kang
- Glaucio H. Paulino
- Xu Guo
- Kurt Maute
- Weisheng Zhang
- Amir M. Mirzendehdel
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Ole Sigmund
- Kurt Maute
- Mattias Schevenels
- Zhan Kang
- Amir M. Mirzendehdel
- Matthijs Langelaar
- Krishnan Suresh
- Jikai Liu
Citations in the corpus
- Stress-constrained topology optimization: a topological level-set approach (2013, background): “…Takalloozadeh Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran problem, may be posed as Eschenauer and Olhoff (2001) and Rozvany (2009): Min ⊂D J | | ≤ v0 in subject to Ku = f (1.1) where: u : Finite element displacement field K : Finite element stiffness matrix f :…”
- Self-supporting structure design in additive manufacturing through explicit topology optimization (2017, background): “On the other hand, topology optimization, which aims at designing innovative and lightweight products by distributing material within a prescribed domain in an optimal way, has reached a certain level of maturity and becomes a well-established research area [1-3].”
- A general formulation of structural topology optimization for maximizing structural stiffness (2011, background): “However, with the penalization in SIMP model, even the originally convex problem (e.g. minimization of compliance for given material volume) becomes non-convex, and therefore, it is theoretically possible to converge to a local optimum (Sigmund and Petersson 1998; Rozvany 2009).”
- Topology optimization of fail-safe structures using a simplified local damage model (2014, background): “7 Rozvany (2009) beam example where the deformation energy is not able to predict the importance of a structural element”
- Explicit three dimensional topology optimization via Moving Morphable Void (MMV) approach (2017, methodology): “We refer the readers to [5-8] and the references therein for a state-of-the-art reviews of the recent developments in topology optimization.”
- General topology optimization method with continuous and discrete orientation design using isoparametric projection (2015, background): “The typical example is the famous Michell’s truss problem [43].”