Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.

By I. Gill, L. Kavoussi, B. Lane, M. Blute, D. Babineau, J. R. Colombo, I. Frank, S. Permpongkosol, Christopher J. Weight, J. Kaouk and 2 more. Journal of Urology, 2007

1,231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48596f165da0a0ebe36d2fa5b0c12b040516d98c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. B. Ljungberg
2. L. Albiges
3. J. Bedke
4. Y. Abu-Ghanem
5. S. Dabestani
6. U. Capitanio
7. K. Bensalah
8. S. Fernandez-Pello

Citations in the corpus

• European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update. (2022, background): “comparing laparoscopic PN and open PN found no difference in PFS or OS between the two techniques in centres with laparoscopic expertise [46,47].”
• EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. (2010, neutral): “The mean estimated blood loss was generally lower with the laparoscopic approach, but warm ischaemia time (WIT) was prolonged [56].”
• European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. (2019, result): “[45] study suggests comparable oncological efficacy even in case of higher-stage tumours (pT1b/pT3a).”