Analyzing Semantic Segmentation Using Hybrid Human-Machine CRFs
By Roozbeh Mottaghi, Sanja Fidler, Jian Yao, Raquel Urtasun, Devi Parikh. 2013
37 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Mohammad Sabokrou
- Oncel Tuzel
- Mahmood Fathy
- Dacheng Tao
- David W. Jacobs
- Luc Van Gool
- Abhishek Sharma
- Xiaogang Wang
Citations in the corpus
- Deep hierarchical parsing for semantic segmentation (2015, methodology): “CRF based image models have been quite successful in jointly modeling the appearance and structure of an image; [7, 16, 15, 14] use CRFs to combine unary potentials obtained from the visual features of super-pixels with the neighborhood constraints.”
- STFCN: Spatio-Temporal FCN for Semantic Video Segmentation (2016, methodology): “The support vector machine (SVM) [43] or a Markov random field (MRF) [38,46] are further methods used for segmentation but not as popular as the conditional random field (CRF) that is in widespread use in recent work[5,29,35].”
- Human vs. Computer in Scene and Object Recognition (2014, unknown): “Several previous studies, under the names of humans in the loop, human debugging, finding weak links (and often using Amazon Mechanical Turk) [27, 26, 36, 28, 34], have used humans to estimate the relative strengths and weaknesses of different algorithm components (e.g., [18, 36]).”