Zooplankton growth, diet and reproductive success compared in simultaneous diatom- and flagellate-microzooplankton-dominated plankton blooms
By Jens C. Nejstgaard, B. H. Hygum, L. Naustvoll, Ulf Bamstedt. 2001
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48351cc66bbed3eb226e9a5e9030895c10dfb7e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Inhibition of population growth in the copepods Acartia clausi and Calanus helgolandicus during diatom blooms (2003, background): “Female C. helgolandicus may therefore have been partially fueling egg production by using body reserves, as previously reported for C. finmarchicus (e.g. Niehoff et al. 2002).”
- Modelling diatom and Phaeocystis blooms and nutrient cycles in the Southern Bight of the North Sea: the MIRO model (2005, background): “No selective feeding (food preference) of copepods was considered due to the lack of data and the current controversy on copepod feeding (see Nejstgaard et al. 2001 and references therein).”
- Spring phenological responses of marine and freshwater plankton to changing temperature and light conditions (2012, background): “are within the preferred prey size range of copepod species (Granéli and Turner 2002; Nejstgaard et al. 2001).”