The endogeneity problem in electoral studies: a critical re-examination of Duverger's mechanical effect☆
By Kenneth Benoit. 2002
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Studies of electoral law consequences typically treat electoral laws as exogenous factors affecting political party systems, even while acknowledging that political parties often tailor electoral institutions to suit their own distributional needs. This study represents a departure from that approach, directly examining one aspect of the endogeneity of electoral systems: the endogeneity of Duverger's ‘mechanical’ effect. Theory clearly posits that the Duvergerian ‘psychological’ effect of electoral rules occurs in anticipation of their reductive mechanical effect, yet in empirical models this endogenous character is typically ignored. In this paper I formalize the two types of Duvergerian effects of electoral laws in a structural model and implement this model using two-stage-least-squares regression to re-estimate the mechanical effect model of Amorim Neto and Cox [Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 41 (1997) 149-174] and Cox [Making Votes Count: Strategic Communication in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press (1997)]. I also generalize the model and compare it to two other approaches taken by Ordeshook and Shvetsova [Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 38 (1994) 100-123] and Taagepera and Shugart [Predicting the number of parties: a quantitative model of Duverger's mechanical effect. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87 (1993) 455-464]. The results indicate that because electoral structure affects the number of parties in the legislature both directly through the mechanical effect as well as indirectly through the psychological effect, simple OLS estimates that do not take into account this endogenous model will overestimate the mechanical effect by 45–100%.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48249c019380f1d2d1c48eb8e22710e13de5a398
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Models of electoral system change (2004, background): “... operates in an election at time t on a vector of votes V to determine the seat vector S. At each election, various forces will shape V and the number of parties P: not only exogenous factors such as party scandals, splits and mergers, and voter realignments, but also endogenous factors stemming ”