From myth to reality: Globalisation and public spending in OECD countries revisited

By Marius R. Busemeyer. 2009

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48074292b1897c68a7963f1bc01488b6aad08006

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Niklas Potrafke
2. C. Jensen
3. Carina Schmitt
4. Peter H. Starke
5. Georgios Efthyvoulou

Citations in the corpus

• Explaining convergence of OECD welfare states: a conditional approach (2011, background): “According to what is commonly known as the ‘efficiency thesis’ in the comparative welfare state literature, economic globalization of the trade in goods and services and the movement of capital should lead to regulatory competition and a (downward) convergence of welfare states (Busemeyer, 2009; Gar”
• Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited (2010, unknown): “(2000) and Busemeyer (2009). The countries included in our analysis are the usual suspects:”
• Partisan Politics: The Empirical Evidence from OECD Panel Studies (2017, unknown): “Busemeyer (2009a) distinguishes between types of education spending in 21 countries.”
• Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross-programme differences (2012, background): “Error correction models have won widespread popularity in recent years as a means to better capture the long- and short-term effects of explanatory variables on changes in the dependent variable (Busemeyer 2009; Iversen and Cusack 2000).”
• Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries (2010, background): “The results presented by Dreher et al. (2008a) suggest, for example, that globalization did not affect budget composition, whereas Busemeyer (2009b) finds a negative association between trade-openness and public spending in OECD countries (see Dreher et al. 2008b; Schulze and Ursprung 1999, and…”