Indigenous, cultural, and cross‐cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis

By U. Kim. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4806861a647b114b03edf43de59d29e1354b325d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Tiera Schroeder
2. J. Fernández
3. E. David
4. S. Okazaki

Citations in the corpus

• Colonialism and Psychology of Culture (2008, background): “In fact, the indigenous psychology movement gathered steam in the 1970s due to the dissatisfaction of many psychologists in non-Western societies with American psychology’s adherence to logicalpositivistic, natural science-patterned, highly quantitative, universal-seeking, and Western-centric resear”
• Internalized Racism: A Systematic Review of the Psychological Literature on Racism's Most Insidious Consequence (2019, background): “…scientific methods, assumptions, and values has contributed to the erasure of many racial groups’ own epistemology or ways of knowing—a tragedy that scholars have called scientific imperialism (e.g., Diaz-Loving, 1999; Enriquez, 1993; Kim, 2000; Shams, 2002) or epistemicide (de Sousa Santos, 2014).”