Largest-Crown- Width Prediction Models for 53 Species in the Western United States

By W. Bechtold. 2004

67 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47ff7741a51407b673d93dae23cd86d610d72473

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Aaron Weiskittel
2. John A. Kershaw
3. Jerome K. Vanclay
4. C. Song
5. D. Hann
6. Hans Pretzsch

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Jerome K. Vanclay
2. Aaron Weiskittel
3. C. Song
4. John A. Kershaw
5. D. Hann

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. John A. Kershaw
2. Jerome K. Vanclay
3. Aaron Weiskittel
4. D. Hann
5. C. Song
6. Hans Pretzsch
7. D. Forrester

Citations in the corpus

• Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, methodology): “Maximum crown width (Krajicek et al., 1961; Vezina, 1962; Ek, 1974b; Paine and Hann, 1982; Farr et al., 1989; Hasenauer, 1997) and LCW (Moeur, 1981; Hann, 1997; Bechtold, 2003; 2004) equations exist for several species.”
• Estimating tree crown size with spatial information of high resolution optical remotely sensed imagery (2007, background): “In addition, tree crown diameter has been found to be closely related to tree bole diameter (Bechtold 2004, Hemery et al. 2005), and thus can further be used to study forest biomass (Alves and Santos 2002).”