Gene flow and species delimitation.

By R. Petit, Laurent Excoffier. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009

776 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47ec68c39b738fb76fc31586e912069091272294

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding (2012, background): “Interspecific mitochondrial and plastid introgressions are common and well documented (Rieseberg & Soltis 1991; Petit & Excoffier 2009), and species that are young in evolutionary terms have often not yet achieved monophyly for these markers (i.e. incomplete lineage sorting), which can potentially…”
Chapter 1: Subspecies Represent Geographically Partitioned Variation, A Gold Mine of Evolutionary Biology, and a Challenge for Conservation (2010, background): “Advances in genetics and the allure of molecular taxonomy can provide insights (e.g., Petit and excoffier 2009), but these tools still do not alleviate the difficulty of diagnosing allopatric taxa and will likely just be added to the taxonomist’s toolbox and used in traditional ways.”
Genetic Introgression: An Integral but Neglected Component of Speciation in Birds (2011, background): “Disregarding cases of geographically widespread introgressive mtDNA sweeps for the moment, levels of mtDNA introgression in avian hybrid zones are often low or zero (Tegelström and Gelter ; Helbig et al.”
Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode (2011, background): “[75] and Petit and Excoffier [76], namely that dispersal ability may be a predictor of species discrimination success, and that there may be an inverse correlation between intraand inter-specific gene flow.”
Species delimitation and relationships: The dance of the seven veils (2015, background): “It also allows researchers to select loci appropriate for particular problems, such as those with high intraspecific gene-flow (thus high connectivity within species) to delimit species (Petit & Excoffier, 2009; Naciri & al., 2012).”
Discordant mtDNA and cpDNA phylogenies indicate geographic speciation and reticulation as driving factors for the diversification of the genus Picea (2011, background): “Indeed, in hybridizing Pinaceae taxa, cpDNA should also be a better indicator of species delimitation than mtDNA, given that markers associated to the most dispersed sex should better delimitate species (Petit and Excoffier 2009).”
The integrative future of taxonomy (2010, background): “This emerging consensus might appear as a minor advance, but it has led to a renewed discussion about species delimitation that is paramount for catalyzing the integration of new knowledge and methods of population biology, phylogenetics, and other evolutionary disciplines into taxonomy [22-32].”
A response to recent proposals for integrative taxonomy (2010, background): “…gained broad acceptance among evolutionary biologists (e.g. Hey, 2006; de Queiroz, 2007; Knowles & Carstens, 2007; Wiens, 2007; Mallet, 2008; Petit & Excoffier, 2009; Degnan & Rosenberg, 2009), with the most illustrative example of this trend probably being the unification of the theory of…”
Species Delimitation: A Decade After the Renaissance (2013, neutral): “Moreover, it has been suggested that neutral loci will also differ in their usefulness for species delimitation since those with higher rates of intra-specific gene flow will be less sensitive to the effect of inter-specific in‐ trogression [99].”
The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals (2012, background): “They likely to be swamped out by gene flow of from other that gene flow of mtDNA in systems with male-biased iased dispersal (Currat et al. 2008; Petit & Excoffier 2009). dispersing sex is confounded with taxonomy (i.e. birds ted data on dispersal bias, it is currently difficult to determine…”