Direct Comparison of Some Recent Rubber Elasticity Models

By D. Seibert, N. Schöche. 2000

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47e613ece8c8111bfd2b88832970ebc312336e6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. S. Sekita
2. A. Amin
3. Y. Okui
4. A. Lion
5. S. I. Wiraguna
6. A. R. Bhuiyan
7. Maryam Hosseini
8. Aidy Ali

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. S. I. Wiraguna
2. A. R. Bhuiyan
3. A. Amin
4. Maryam Hosseini
5. Aidy Ali
6. A. Lion
7. Y. Okui
8. S. Sekita

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. S. I. Wiraguna
2. A. R. Bhuiyan
3. A. Amin
4. Maryam Hosseini
5. Aidy Ali
6. A. Lion
7. Y. Okui
8. S. Sekita

Citations in the corpus

• Hyperelasticity Model for Finite Element Analysis of Natural and High Damping Rubbers in Compression and Shear (2006, methodology): “To overcome the ill-conditioning problem arising due to incompressible deformation, a penalty function algorithm Simo and Taylor 1982 was used.”
• A review of constitutive models for rubber-like materials (2010, methodology): “AA Balkema Publishers, UK., ISBN: 10: 9058095665, pp: 203-211 Boyce, M.C. and E.M. Arruda, 2000.”
• Nonlinear dependence of viscosity in modeling the rate-dependent response of natural and high damping rubbers in compression and shear: Experimental identification and numerical verification (2006, methodology): “In this approach, a suitable hyperelasticity model (Mooney, 1940; Rivlin, 1948; Boyce and Arruda, 2000; Seibert and Schöche, 2000) is employed to reproduce the elastic responses represented by the springs, while the dashpot represents the inelastic or the so-called internal strain.”