Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

By S. Kurtz, K. Ong, E. Lau, F. Mowat, M. Halpern. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume, 2007

8,478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Surgery

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. (2008, background): “However, with the increasing use of TKA in the US population [9,10], we can expect a greater clinical impact from more infected TKAs that will be encountered in the future as compared to THAs.”
Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030 (2009, methodology): “We also asked whether current trends are advancing according to earlier expectations [ 6 ].”
Bacterial interactions with nanostructured surfaces (2018, background): “12,13 Since the frequency of these procedures is increasing, revisions of total hip and total knee arthroplasties are estimated to increase at rates as high as 137% and 601%, respectively between 2005 and 2030 14 at almost double costs compared to primary arthroplasties.”
Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. (2007, methodology): “The goals of our study were to (1) quantify the future number of infections at the site of arthroplasties done in the United States, (2) determine the historical longevity and survival of implants in the United States and compare this information with data from well-established and validated Scandin”
Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040-2060 (2023, methodology): “The codes were divided into 2 categories: (1) primary THA and (2) primary TKA (see Appendix).”