A Study on Sigmoid Kernels for SVM and the Training of non-PSD Kernels by SMO-type Methods
By Hsuan-Tien Lin. 2005
701 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47e3fa7eeb0a88d64a9510c33ae256a35616edac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Gustau Camps-Valls
- Francis R. Bach
- Luis Gómez-Chova
- Ronny Luss
- Yoshua Bengio
- Kwok-Wing Chau
- Krikamol Muandet
- Alex Smola
Citations in the corpus
- Pan evaporation prediction using a hybrid multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm (MLP-FFA) model: case study in North Iran (2018, methodology): “Prior to modeling, the entire data sets were normalized to be between 0 and 1 to avoid issues related to larger numeric attributes dominating the importance of smaller numeric ranges in the MLP and SVM model (Lin and Lin 2003).”
- An up-to-date comparison of state-of-the-art classification algorithms (2017, background): “The study in Lin and Lin (2003) proves that the sigmoid kernel is not better than the RBF kernel in general; moreover, the quality of the local minimum solution in parameters of the sigmoid kernel may not be guaranteed, it is therefore hard to select suitable parameters for the sigmoid kernel.”
- Learning with Distance Substitution Kernels (2004, background): “Numerics: Convergence of SVM implementations to a (possibly local) stationary point can be guaranteed [9].”
- A GA-based feature selection and parameters optimizationfor support vector machines (2006, methodology): “To implement our proposed approach, this research used the RBF kernel function for the SVM classifier because the RBF kernel function can analysis higher-dimensional data and requires that only two parameters, C and g be defined (Hsu, Chang, & Lin, 2003; Lin and Lin, 2003).”
- A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification (2009, background): “In addition, the sigmoid kernel behaves like RBF for certain parameters (Lin and Lin, 2003).”
- Particle swarm optimization for parameter determination and feature selection of support vector machines (2008, background): “Lin et al. / Expert Systems with Applications 35 (2008) 1817–1824”
- Support vector machine classification with indefinite kernels (2007, background): “Yet another option is to reformulate either the maximum marg in problem or its dual in order to use the indefinite kernel in a convex optimization problem (s ee [13]).”
- Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders (2013, methodology): “To implement our proposed approach, the RBF kernel function is used for the SVM classifier since the RBF kernel function can analyze higher dimensional data [16,41].”
- LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines (2011, background): “In (Lin and Lin, 2003), we have studied this issue in detail and proposed the following modification:”
- Support vector machines in DSC‐based glioma imaging: Suggestions for optimal characterization (2010, background): “k, W could be considered as a scaling and shifting parameter of the tanh function (33).”
- A Study on SMO-Type Decomposition Methods for Support Vector Machines (2006, unknown): “The above discussion is related to [19], which examines how t o solve (2) when it is non-convex.”