Dyadic Coping and Its Significance for Marital Functioning.

By Guy Bodenmann. 2005

870 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47d47f3609d5ec4bebab0f34de4ec34778f08bc3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. (2007, positive): “…situated squarely within the dyadic coping perspective (Bodenmann, Charvoz, Cina, & Widmer, 2003; Bodenmann & Shantinath, 2004; Kayser, 2005; Widmer, Cina, Charvoz, Shantinath, & Bodenmann, 2005) hold great promise for strengthening the marital relationship as couples deal with chronic illness.”
Two Conceptualizations of Dyadic Coping and Their Potential for Predicting Relationship Quality and Individual Well-Being A Comparison (2011, background): “Both approaches have stimulated a large body of research supporting the notion that dyadic coping plays an important role in understanding relationship functioning and well-being of individuals living in close relationships (e.g., Acitelli & Badr, 2005; Berg & Upchurch, 2007; Bodenmann, 2005; Haaged”
Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction (2015, background): “…suggest potential gender differences in dyadic coping responses and their perceptions (Badr, 2004; Bodenmann et al., 2004; Donato & Parise, 2012), several studies failed to demonstrate gendered patterns in dyadic coping (Bodenmann, 2005; Bodenmann, Meuwly, Bradbury, Gmelch, & Ledermann, 2010).”
Stress and Coping Among Stable-Satisfied, Stable-Distressed and Separated/Divorced Swiss Couples (2006, background): “In addition to individual coping, dyadic coping (i.e., interpersonal stress management in couples) proved to be, above all, a predominant and powerful predictor of relationship quality and stability (see Bodenmann, 2005, for an overview).”
Emotional Coregulation in Close Relationships (2013, background): “Other examples include dyadic coping, whereby the stress management resources of partners are engaged to restore homeostasis between them (Bodenmann, 2005; Randall & Bodenmann, 2009), and capitalization, which occurs when one partner shares positive events and the other responds enthusiastically, a…”
The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. (2009, background): “Currently many researchers and theorists agree in that stress in couples is always a dyadic phenomenon that affects both partners in some way (Bodenmann, 2005; Story & Bradbury, 2004; Williams, 1995).”
Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping (2010, background): “Despite these limitations, these findings add to a growing body of research and theory which suggests that the experience and expression of strong negative emotions in marriage are governed by the stressors that partners perceive, and that interpersonal processes can buffer partners from the harmful”
The role of stress in divorce: A three-nation retrospective study (2007, background): “…marriage, popular five decades ago (e.g., Hill, 1958), are again gaining visibility as important complements to intrapersonally and interpersonally oriented explanations of marital development (e.g., Bodenmann, 1995, 2005; Bradbury, Fincham, & Beach, 2000; see Story & Bradbury, 2004, for a review).”