Taxes, economic conditions and recent trends in male self-employment: a Canada–US comparison
By Herbert J. Schuetze. 2000
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47cba14b193ef8a07ea1e75b26d503117b3306fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Simon C. Parker
- J. Cullen
- Roger H. Gordon
- Mohammed Mohsin
- Yacine Belghitar
- Donald Bruce
- Andrew Henley
- R. Sobel
In Sociology and Political Science
- Yacine Belghitar
- Donald Bruce
- Simon C. Parker
- J. Cullen
- Mohammed Mohsin
- Roger H. Gordon
- Randall Reback
Citations in the corpus
- Taxes and Entrepreneurial Activity: Theory and Evidence for the U.S (2002, background): “Recent examples include Bruce (2000), Schuetze (2000), and Fairlie and Meyer (2000).”
- "Success Taxes," Entrepreneurial Entry, and Innovation (2005, unknown): “Several studies using household-level data (e.g., Long, 1982b; Moore, 1983; and Schuetze, 2000) report that higher marginal tax rates are associated with higher probabilities of self-employment.”
- Entrepreneurship and public policy (2009, unknown): “143 Parker (1996) and Schuetze (2000) find a positive effect (i.e., higher tax rate increases entrepreneurial activity), for example, whereas Moore (2004) observes a negative effect.”
- Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Theory and evidence for the U.S. ☆ (2007, background): “A number of past papers have examined the effects of such differential tax rates on self-employment rates, including Bruce (2000), Schuetze (2000), and Fairlie and Meyer (1999). arbitrary differences in propensities for entrepreneurial activity across ability groups.”
- Tax Policy and Entrepreneurship: New Time Series Evidence (2006, background): “6 See Bruce (2000) (2002), Cullen and Gordon (2002), Gentry and Hubbard (2000), and Schuetze (2000) for a more detailed discussion and for recent empirical evidence.”