Transforming Models with ATL

By Frédéric Jouault, Ivan Kurtev. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, 2005

1,125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using ASEME Methodology for Model-Driven Agent Systems Development (2010, methodology): “The ATL engine searches the rules to find one that transforms the types of the EReference (i.e. the SAG Actor concepts to a SUC Role).”
The Epsilon Transformation Language (2008, methodology): “Although various approaches to automated model transformation have been proposed, the current consensus is that specialized languages, such as QVT [2] and ATL [3], which provide a mixture of declarative and imperative constructs, are most suitable for specifying model transformations.”
ATL: A model transformation tool (2008, methodology): “Furthermore, the ATL tool supports most of the planned features of the ATL language as specified in Table 2 of [7].”
KM3: A DSL for Metamodel Specification (2006, methodology): “This conversion from a UML model to a MOF metamodel is called a promotion and implemented by some widely available tools like UML2MOF available in the NetBeans MDR [2] suite or also by an ATL [3] model transformation program.”