Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

By S. Gaudry, D. Hajage, F. Schortgen, L. Martin‐Lefèvre, B. Pons, É. Boulet, A. Boyer, G. Chevrel, N. Lerolle, D. Carpentier and 15 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016

976 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Emergency Medical Services, Nephrology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47b7f3a482c9f59fe19b0f6ec6f9f6b409a7ee02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nephrology

1. John A. Kellum
2. R. Bellomo
3. Claudio Ronco
4. Sean M. Bagshaw
5. M. Ostermann
6. R. Chang

Citations in the corpus

• COVID-19 and Multiorgan Response (2020, neutral): “There is little to no evidence that the starting time 49 , modality 50 and dose 51 of RRT has any difference in outcomes.”
• Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 (2017, background): “Since then, two relevant RCTs [508, 509] were published in 2016.”
• EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. (2018, neutral): “suggest that early RRT improves survival [384-386].”
• Acute kidney injury in sepsis (2017, background): “A third RCT with almost 80% septic patients found no difference in survival between early and delayed RRT [80].”