Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus)
By M. Hayward, P. Henschel, J. O’Brien, M. Hofmeyr, G. Balme, G. Kerley. 2006
622 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47b2282ebedf69af2828210da2c1fcd338cbe9a4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Genetics
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Leopard prey choice in the Congo Basin rainforest suggests exploitative competition with human bushmeat hunters (2011, background): “Despite a celebrated ability to exploit prey ranging from arthropods to elands (Kingdon, 1977), leopard diet is generally dominated by medium-sized ungulates with a weight range of 10–40 kg (Hayward et al., 2006), and leopard population density is strongly and positively correlated to the biomass of”
- Do tigers displace leopards? If so, why? (2010, background): “…and leopard competition would probably not be exploitative, firstly, because the study area sustained very high densities of medium-sized ungulates (Wegge et al. 2009; Støen andWegge 1996), which are suitable prey for leopards (Odden and Wegge 2005, 2009; Hayward et al. 2006; Wegge et al. 2009).”
- Feeding behaviour and bone utilization by theropod dinosaurs (2009, background): “Small prey of a given species is also typically preferred over larger individuals by such diverse predators as leopards (Hayward et al. 2006), hunting dogs (Fuller & Kat 1993), bluefish (Scharf et al. 1998) and several invertebrates (Barbeau & Scheibling 1994) or simply small prey in general (e.g.…”
- Panthera pardus (Carnivora: Felidae) (2013, background): “Although it prefers prey within the range of 10–40 kg, in the absence of larger competitors, it may feed on larger prey (Hayward et al. 2006; Stein 2008).”
- The potential for large carnivores to act as biodiversity surrogates in southern Africa (2008, background): “…the spotted hyaena (56–182 kg; Hayward 2006) primarily hunt medium sized and large ungulates and also overlap in prey preferences (Hayward 2006), whereas cheetah and leopards rely on hunting somewhat smaller prey (cheetah: 23–56 kg, Hayward et al. 2006a; leopard: 10–40 kg, Hayward et al. 2006b).”
- Forest without prey: livestock sustain a leopard Panthera pardus population in Pakistan (2014, background): “There are conflicting reports about leopard predation on primates from different parts of its range in Asia and Africa (Kummer et al., 1981; Cowlishaw, 1994; Isbell, 1994; Nowell & Jackson, 1996; Zuberbühler & Jenny, 2002; Hayward et al., 2006).”
- Do fences constrain predator movements on an evolutionary scale? Home range, food intake and movement patterns of large predators reintroduced to Addo Elephant National Park, South Africa (2009, background): “…of significantly preferred prey, which has been shown to improve relationships between lion density and prey biomass (Hayward and Kerley 2005; Hayward 2006; Hayward et al. 2006, 2007e) and therefore probably home range size, because data on the biomass of individual species were rarely available.”
- Coexistence of the tiger and the common leopard in a prey-rich area: the role of prey partitioning (2015, background): “, 2011) and these species fit within its preferred prey weight range (Hayward et al., 2006; Lovari et al., 2013b).”
- Snow leopard Panthera uncia predation on livestock and wild prey in a mountain valley in northern Nepal: implications for conservation management (2012, background): “Higher values are reported for lowland leopards Panthera pardus (Bailey 1993, Hayward et al. 2006).”